Bioethics
Triumphs and Ethical Concerns of Animal De-Extinction
Colossal Biosciences says it brought back the dire wolf. What it made is a gray wolf with edited genes, and the gap between the two is an ethics problem.
Cover · Microglia in Neurovirology: Friend or Foe?, by Deekshitha Ravipati, Kognovate Education and Research, Hyderabad, India. 3D clay.
Download the issue (PDF)Current edition
Edition 5 · Fall 2026
Also in this edition
- 10Depression Between the Electrodes: Why AI Misreads the Brain's Broken Network
- 13The Immunotherapy Lottery
- 16The Human Heart
- 17Organ-on-a-Chip: No, it’s Not a Snack
- 20Why Our Picture of Parkinson’s Is Wrong
- 22Brains in a Dish: The Looming Concerns of Brain Organoids
- 24LFP batteries: The Chemistry That Waited for the Right Time
- 27The Infrastructure of Survival: Integrating High-Performance Computing and SIR Frameworks into Global Health Policy
- 30From Scene to Synapse: Rethinking Film Education with Neurocinematics
- 32Neuronanomedicine and the Future of Central Nervous System-Related Disorders
- 35Same Drug, Different Outcome
- 36Microglia: Weaving the Link Between Hypertension and Alzheimer’s
- 39From Ayurveda to Instagram: The Hype and Hope of Ashwagandha
From the Summer Publishing Program
All SPP piecesAugust 18, 2026
What Split-Brain Patients Reveal About the Architecture of Consciousness and the SelfAugust 18, 2026
Disrupting Dystrophinopathies: The Road to AnswersAugust 18, 2026
Running Towards the Sting
Publish with us
Columbia Scientist selects a small number of exceptional pieces each cycle: opinion editorials, briefings, letters, science art, and podcast scripts.
Every accepted piece is worked on closely with an editor, published in the annual edition and on this site with a permanent citable page, and released under a CC BY 4.0 licence. You keep the copyright. We welcome work from accomplished contributors at every stage: exceptional students, graduate researchers, and practicing scientists. There are no fees.
2026–2027 Edition: submissions close January 15, 2027; decisions by late April 2027.
What editors look for
- A specific claim, not a survey. The strongest pieces argue something. “Space mining repeats the pattern of colonial extraction” is a claim. “An overview of space mining” is not.
- Evidence a reader can check. Cite primary literature where you can. We publish your references, and readers follow them.
- Written for an intelligent non-specialist. Assume a curious reader with no background in your subfield. Define your terms once, then move.
- A reason it matters now. Timeliness is not a requirement, but the pieces that land tend to connect to something a reader has encountered.
About the journal
About & mastheadColumbia Scientist was founded in 2022 as the non-research journal of the Columbia Undergraduate Science Journal. Where CUSJ publishes original research, Columbia Scientist publishes the writing around it: argument, explanation, commentary, and art. Submissions come from exceptional students, researchers, and practicing scientists around the world, and are reviewed by the editorial board at Columbia, advised by a faculty board of ten Columbia professors.
- Founded
- 2022
- Editions
- 5
- Authors in Edition 5
- 14
- Institutions
- 8
- Fees
- None
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
Faculty advisory board
- Hugh DucklowProfessor of Earth & Environmental Sciences
- Ivana HughesDirector of Frontiers of Science & Senior Lecturer in Discipline, Chemistry
- Marko JovanovicAssistant Professor of Biological Sciences
- Laura KaufmanProfessor of Chemistry
- Patricia LindemannDirector of Undergraduate Studies & Lecturer in Discipline, Psychology
- Kyle MandliProfessor of Applied Mathematics
- Gerard ParkinProfessor of Chemistry
- Ron PrywesProfessor of Biological Sciences
- Rachel RosenAssociate Professor of Physics
- Samuel SternbergAssistant Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biophysics